Reflection on the Limits and Scope of the Islamic Theology
https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2019-15-3-23-34
Abstract
The present article is devoted to the issue of determining the disciplinary boundaries of Islamic theology in the context of the ‘Western’ views on nature and place of theological thought in the framework of intellectual subjects. The author emphasizes the historical dependency of the terms used in academic study of religion (religious studies) on the religious teaching of religion, as it has formed in Christian tradition. It is shown that the further progress of critical optics of social sciences and humanities is tied with decolonization of the scholar’s thinking. The urgent need for dialogue between different intellectual traditions is substantiated, for it is necessary to create a conceptual framework that is to be adequate to heterogeneous nature of the historical forms of religion. It is being proven in the article presented that there is only one alternative to the scholar’s consideration of the inner connections and the structure of discursive tradition of Islam itself: a covert ‘missionary contention’ conducted by the scholar against those belonging to the other tradition. It is stressed that any genuine (as opposed to formal) solution to the problem of unequivocal classification of Islamic theology in Western academic system may only be conditional. In conclusion the author turns to the essential affinity in the nature of authority of Islamic theologian, on the one hand, and that of Western scientist or philosopher, on the other.
About the Author
D. V. MukhetdinovRussian Federation
Damir V. MUKHETDINOV, Cand. Sci. (Polit.), rector of Moscow Islamic Institute; Professor of the Faculty of Asian and African Studies, Saint Petersburg State University
(12, Kirova Lane, 109382, Moscow);
(11, Universitetskaya Emb., Saint Petersburg, 1990340
References
1. Arkoun M. (2017). Pereosmyslyaya islam segodnya [Rethinking Islam Today]. Islamskaya mysl’: traditsiya i sovremennost’. Religiozno-filosofskii ezhegodnik. Vol. 2. Moscow: Medina. Pp. 244–272.
2. Asad T. (2017). Ideya antropologii islama [The Idea of Islamic Anthropology]. Islamology. Vol. 7. No. 1. Pp. 42–60.
3. Castro de E. V. (2017). Kannibal’skie metafiziki: rubezhi poststrukturnoi antropologii [Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. 200 p.
4. Efremova N. V. (2015). Islam: filosofiya, religiya, kul’tura. Chast’ 1. Teologofilosofskaya mysl’ [Islam: Philosophy, Religion, Culture. Part 1. TheologicalPhilosophical Thought]. Moscow: Nauka. 230 p.
5. Frolova E. A. (2010). Arabskaya filosofiya: proshloe i nastoyashchee [Arabic Philosophy: Past and Present]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur. 464 p.
6. Smirnov A. V. (ed.) (2013). Istoriya arabo-musul’manskoi filosofii [History of Arab-Muslim Philosophy]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. 255 p.
7. Kamali Z. (2010). Filosofiya islama: v 2 t. T. 1. Ch. 1: Filosofiya veroubezhdeniya [Philosophy of Islam. In 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Part 1. Philosophy of Belief]. Kazan’: Tatarskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo. 319 p.
8. Pagani S. (2016). Ibn ‘Arabī, Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, and the Political Functions of Punishment in the Islamic Hell. Lange C. (ed.) Locating Hell in Islamic Traditions. Leiden: Brill. Pp. 175–207.
9. Said E. W. (2006) Orientalizm. Zapadnye kontseptsii Vostoka [Orientalism]. Saint Petersburg: Russkii Mir. 637 p.
Review
For citations:
Mukhetdinov D.V. Reflection on the Limits and Scope of the Islamic Theology. Islam in the modern world. 2019;15(3):23-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2019-15-3-23-34