THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL BASIS FOR THE STUDY OF THE CRIMEAN TATAR ETHNOPOLITICAL PROCESS
https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2019-15-2-151-166
Abstract
The article is devoted to such an important phenomenon in modern political science as the ethno-political process, as well as theoretical and methodological grounds for the study of the Crimean Tatar ethnopolitical process, which is one of the most ambiguous and controversial cases not only in modern Russia, but also in the world. The contradictory nature of the Crimean Tatar ethnopolitical process is determined by the controversy from the point of view of international law of the territory of Crimea — the main area of the process. Particular attention is paid to the theoretical and methodological features of the study of the ethnopolitical process as a category of political science. The essence and content of such a phenomenon as ethnopolitical mobilization and the possibility of using theoretical developments in this fi eld to study the Crimean Tatar ethnopolitical process are revealed.
Keywords
ethnopolitical process,
ethnopolitical mobilization,
Crimea,
Crimean Tatars,
Ukraine,
politicized ethnicity
УДК: 23.00.05
About the Author
K. N. AKHMADEEV
Moscow Islamic Institute
Centralized religious organization “Spiritual Board of Muslims of Saint Petersburg and Leningrad region (Mukhtasibate of Saint Petersburg)”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Polit.), senior researcher,
12, Kirova Lane, Moscow, 109382, Russian Federation
the head of the press service, Spiritual Board of Muslims of Saint Petersburg and Leningrad region
35B, 6th Line of Vassilievsky Island, Saint Petersburg, 199178, Russian Federation
References
1. Europe]. Nacii i nacionalizm. Moscow. Pp.121–145.
2. Ahmadeev K. N. (2019). Krymskotatarskoe soobshchestvo sovremennoj Rossii: problema samoopredeleniya [Crimean Tatar Community in Present-Day Russia: Problem of Self-Determination]. Thesis. Saint Petersburg. 187 p.
3. Tishkov V. A., Shabaev Yu. P. (2011). Etnopolitologiya — politicheskie funkcii etnichnosti. Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Ethnopolitical Science. Political Functions of Ethnicity. Textbook]. Moscow: MGU, 2011. 376 p.
4. Achkasov V. A. (2005). Etnopolitologiya [Ethnopolitology]. Saint Petersburg: SPbGU. 336 s.
5. Arlyapova Е. S. (2006). Etnopoliticheskie processy v Chechne: 1917–2000 gg. [Ethnopolitical Processes in Chechnya: 1917–2000]. Thesis. Moscow. 258 p.
6. Stepanov V. V. (2009). Principy, ob’ekty i terminologiya etnologicheskoj ekspertizy [Principles, Objects, Terminology of Ethnological Expertise]. Rasy i narody: sovremennye etnicheskie i rasovye problemy: Ezhegodnik. Vol. 34. Moscow: Nauka. Pp. 143–160.
7. Baranov A. V. (2005). Gosudarstvennaya nacional’naya politika na Yuge Rossii: prioritety i napravleniya reform [State National Policy in the South of Russia: Priorities and Directions of Reforms]. IV Mezhdunarodnyj kongress «Mir na Severnom Kavkaze cherez yazyki, obrazovanie, kul’turu. Moscow. S. 87–90.
8. Abdulatipov R. G. (2004). Etnopolitologiya [Ethnopolitology]. Saint Petersburg: Piter. 315 s.
9. Ahmadeev K. N. (2017). Issledovanie etnopoliticheskih processov: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie osnovy [Study of Ethnopolitical Processes: Theoretical and Methodological Grounds]. Razvitie nauki i tekhniki: mekhanizm vybora i realizacii prioritetov. Sbornik statej Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Ufa. S. 185–187.
10. Borisova O. V. (2003). Etnicheskie gruppy v politicheskom processe (konceptual’nye osnovy etnopolitologii) [Ethnic Groups in Political Process (Conceptual Grounds of Ethnopolitology]. Ul’yanovsk. 172 s.
11. Ryabcev O. V. (2008). Setevoj princip deyatel’nosti organizacij zakrytogo tipa v kontekste ugroz nacional’noj i regional’noj bezopasnosti Rossii: na primere krymsko-tatarskogo nacional’nogo dvizheniya [Network Principle in Activity of Closed Organizations in Context of Menaces to National and Regional Safety. Crimean Tatar National Movement]. Rostov-on-Don. 182 s.
12. Gerasimova O. Е. (2016). Social’naya mobilizaciya etnosov: osnovnye etapy i factory [Ethnic Social Mobilization. Main Stages and Factors]. Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Seria Sociologiya. Politologiya. 2016. No. 4. S. 466–474.
13. Sasse G. (2007). The Crimea Question: Identity, Transition, and Confl ict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 359 s.
14. Tishkov V. A. (2003). Rekviem po etnosu: issledovaniya po social’nokul’turnoj antropologii [Requiem for Ethnos. Studies on Social and Cultural Anthropology]. Moscow: Nauka. 544 s.
15. Brass P. (1974). Language, Religion and Politics in North India. Cambridge. 434 р.
16. Hroh M. (2002). Ot nacional’nyh dvizhenij k polnost’yu sformirovavshejsya nacii: process stroitel’stva nacij v Еvrope [From National Movements to the in Full Measure Shaped Nation. The Process of Nations Building in
17. Europe]. Nacii i nacionalizm. Moscow. Pp.121–145.
Review
For citations:
AKHMADEEV K.N. THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL BASIS FOR THE STUDY OF THE CRIMEAN TATAR ETHNOPOLITICAL PROCESS. Islam in the modern world. 2019;15(2):151-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2019-15-2-151-166
Views:
710
Email this article 