OVERCOMING STEREOTYPES (FACTORS WHICH PROVOKE ISLAMOPHOBIA)
https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2019-15-2-121-134
Abstract
In the modern world Islamophobia is one of the most dangerous types of negative stereotypes that give rise to prejudices, discrimination and even aggression. Laypeople and politicians, scholars and theologians bear responsibility for multiplication and distribution of stereotyping in media. The journalists too often are not capable to distinguish religion from its believers. Islam and Muslims are not synonyms: in fact, we are talking about behavioral paradigms of the believers, not about their sacred teaching. Evaluation of Islam as radical, fanatic, intolerant, terrorist, etc., is unjustifi ed and inconsistent. The article argues inadmissibility of using the most common polar adjectives like “radical” and “traditional” for defi ning Islam. It is proposed to carry out the fundamental distinction between the actors at the political front and the participants of ideological and theological polemics. In the fi rst case, it would be appropriate to name «the radicals» as the militant fanatics, while «the traditionalists» as the tolerant Muslims. In the second case, it might be more precise to name one side as the Muslim orthodoxy, while the opposite side — renewal movement or religious reconstruction. The need to free debates involving both the reputable theologians and the ordinary Muslims is urgent. This kind of discussion might help both scholars and media representatives to free themselves from stereotypes that instigate Islamophobia.
Keywords
УДК: 23.00.02
About the Author
M. T. STEPANYANTSRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Full Professor, Honored Scholar of the Russian
Federation, Main Researcher
Bld. 1, 12, Goncharnaya str., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation
References
1. Ahmed S., Matthes J. (2017) Media Representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A Meta-Analysis. International Communication Gazette. No. 79(3). Pp. 219–244.
2. Aruhov Z. A. (2003). Poiski etnicheskoi i religioznoi identichnosti v Dagestane [Searching of Ethnic and Religious Identity in Dagestan]. Religiya i identichnost’ v Rossii. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura. Pp. 177–191.
3. Fallaci O. (2004) Yarost i gordost [Rage and Proud] Moscow: Vagrius. 159 p.
4. Fallaci O (2001). La Rabbia e l’Orgoglio. RCS Libri S-p.a., Milano. Oxford University Press. 198 p.
5. Iqbal М. (2002). Reconstructia religioznoi mysli v islame [Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura. 196 p.
6. McDonough S. (1970) The Authority of the Past. A Study of Three Muslim Modernists. Chambersburg: American Academy of Religion. 1970. 56 p.
7. Muhetdinov D. (2017) Istoricheskaya pobeda ahl al-hadith — eto pobeda do islamskogo mishleniya vnutri musulmanskoi traditsii [Historical Win of Ahl Al-Hadith as a Win of Pre-Islamic Thought Inside the Islamic Tradition]. Islam v sovremennom mire. Vol. 13 (1). Pp. 185–208.
8. Paracha N. (2015) The Volatile Fusion: Origins, Rise & Demise of the ‘Islamic Left. Dawn.com. Dawn News. (27.08.2015).
9. Parvez G. A. (1953) Selim ke nam [Letter to Selim] (in Urdu). Vol.1. Karachi: Idara-e Tulu‘-e Islam. Pp. 74–79.
10. Parwez G. A. (1957) Islamic Ideology. Lahore: Idara-e Tulu‘-e Islam
11. Ragozina S. A. (2019). Politicheskij obraz islama (na materiale central’nyh rossij skih pechatnyh SMI, 2010–2017) [Political Image of Islam According to Centralized Russian Printed Media, 2010–2017)]. Thesis.
12. Sokolov V. V. (2004) Istoricheskoe vvedenie v fi losofi yu [Historical Introduction
13. in Philosophy] Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. 912 p.
14. Stepanyants M. T. (1974) Islam v filosofskoi i obshchestvennoi misli zarubezhnogo vostoka [Islamic Philosophy and Social Thought (XIX–XX Centuries)] Moscow: Vostochnaya literaturа. 202 p.
Review
For citations:
STEPANYANTS M.T. OVERCOMING STEREOTYPES (FACTORS WHICH PROVOKE ISLAMOPHOBIA). Islam in the modern world. 2019;15(2):121-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2019-15-2-121-134