Meaningfulness and Responsibility in Islamic Discourse
https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2020-16-1-73-82
Abstract
The discourse as the process of linguistic activity, as the complicated communicative phenomena is broadly studies in the works of Russian as well as European scholars. The paper deals with the short outline of works, which are devoted to the study of theme of global power of discursive communication. In the circumstances of human interaction the information is not only a mode to interact; it is also a factor, which unites people, lets it develop and influence mutually. This paper deals with discursive practices of Islam, describes problems of false understanding of Islamic theology. The author strives for rethink some Islamic concepts, because of being aware of necessity to translate them into the modern language. Some important terms, as it was shown, are incorrectly translated. It requires meaningfulness and responsibility while speaking about Islam and for Muslims.
About the Author
G. Yu. Khabibullina
Moscow Islamic Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gulfiya Yu. KHABIBULLINA, Cand. Sci. (Pedag.), head of the Centre of Development of Islamic Education
12, Kirova Lane, Moscow, 109382
References
1. Svyashchennyj Koran. Smyslovoj perevod s kommentariyami Abdully Yusufa Ali [The Holy Qur’an. Translation of Meanings Provided by the Commentary of ‘Abdullah Yusuf ‘Ali] (2015). Moscow: Medina. 1888 p.
2. Andreeva G. M. (2006). Social’naya psihologiya: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Social Psychology: Manual for Universities]. 5-e izd., dop. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 363 p.
3. Arabsko-russkij slovar’ [Arabic-Russian Dictionary] (1994). Vol. 1. Tashkent: Kamalak. 456 p.
4. Bustanov A. K., Kemper M. (eds.) (2012). Islamic Authority and the Russian Language: Studies on Texts from European Russia, the North Caucasus and West Siberia. Amsterdam: Pegasus. 416 p.
5. Ivahnenko E. N. (2008) Rossijskij universitet pered licom prinuditel’nyh epistem neoglobalizma [Russian Universities Face to Compulsory Epistems of Neoglobalism]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 122–129.
6. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. (2002). Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Explanatory Dictionary of Russian]. 4-e izd., dop. Moscow. 944 p.
7. Muftij Ravil’ Gajnutdin (2012). Privetstvie [Greeting]. Rabota s musul’manskoj molodezh’yu v obrazovatel’nyh uchrezhdeniyah i religioznyh ob’edineniyah v Rossii i za rubezhom: sbornik materialov i nauchnyh statej, predstavlennyh na IV mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «Rabota s musul’manskoj molodezh’yu v obrazovatel’nyh uchrezhdeniyah i religioznyh ob’edineniyah v Rossii i za rubezhom». Moskva, 25–26 noyabrya 2011. Moscow: Moskovskiy islamskiy universitet. Pp. 5–6.
8. Polosin A. V. (2001). Preodolenie yazychestva: Vvedenie v filosofiyu monoteizma [Overcoming the Paganism: Introduction into the Philosophy of Monotheism]. Moscow: Ladomir. 196 p.
Review
For citations:
Khabibullina G.Yu. Meaningfulness and Responsibility in Islamic Discourse. Islam in the modern world. 2020;16(1):73-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2020-16-1-73-82
Views:
757
Email this article 