THE POLEMIC ABOUT THE ALIENATION OF PROPERTY ACCORDING TO ‘NAZR’ IN DAGESTAN IN THE XIX CENTURY
https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2018-14-4-183-200
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the analysis of the controversy of Dagestan theologians in the XIX century about an application of Nazr, one of the methods of free alienation of property existing in Islamic law. After determination of the nature and types of nazr, the paper consistently reveals the practice of applying of nazr during the period of Shamil’s Imamate, and then in the whole Dagestan region. Confl ict situations arising from the application of nazr and the reaction of Imam Shamil to it are disclosed in the paper. Сonsiderable attention of the article is given to the polemics that unfolded between well-known Dagestanian theologians and jurists, Muhammadtahir al-Karahi and Haji Ali al-Akushi. The reasons for its occurrence and the content of works in Arabic that arose during the polemic are examined in detail in this paper, also the arguments given by each of the parties to convince the opponent of their truth are analyzed. The study reveals the profound knowledge of Muslim legal literature by the Dagestan theologians.
About the Author
R. S. AbdulmazhidovRussian Federation
Competing Interests:
head of Department of Oriental Studies.
75, Yaragski Str., Makhachkala, Republic of Dagestan, 367030, Russian Federation.
References
1. Abdulmazhidov R. S., Shekhmagomedov M. G. (2014). Istochnikovedcheskiy analiz sochineniya Muhammadtahira al-Karahi «Kitab ‘ibarat al-i‘tibar fi istislah al-a‘mal bi kadri al-iktidar» («Kniga o znachimosti stremleniya uluchshit’ svoi deyaniya po mere sil»). [The Book on the Importance of Eff orts to Improve Their Actions as Far as Possible]. Sovremennye problemynauki i obrazovaniya. 2014. № 1.
2. Ad-Durgeli, Nazir. (2012). Uslada umov v biografi yakh dagestanskikh uchenykh. Dagestanskie uchenye X–XX vv. i ikh sochineniya [The Delight of Minds in the Biographies of Daghestani Scholars. Daghestani Scholars of the Xth — XXth Centuries]. Shikhsaidov A. R., Kemper M., Bustanov A. K., editors. Moscow: Marjani. 202 + 223 p.
3. Zakony volnyh obshchestv XVII–XIX vv. (2007). [The Laws of Independent Societies]. Makhachkala. 300 p.
4. Muhammadtahir al-Karahi. (2014). Kniga o znachimosti stremleniya uluchshat svoi deyaniya po mere sil (Kitab ‘ibarat al-i‘tibar fi istislah al-a‘mal bi k’adri al-ik’tidar).[The Book on the Importance of Eff orts to Improve Their Actions as Far as Possible]. Translated by Abdulmazhidov R. S., Shekhmagomedov M. G., Malamagomedov D. M. Moscow: Vostochnaja literatura. 134 p.
5. Nizam Shamilya [Imam Shamil’s Nizam] (1870). Sbornik svedeniy o kavkazskikh gortsakh. Vol. III. Pt. I. Tifl is. S. 1–18.
6. Pamyatniki obychnogo prava Dagestana XVII–XIX vv. (1965). [The Monuments of Customary Law of Dagestan of the XVII–XIX Centuries]. Moscow. 280 p.
7. Polemika dagestanskih uchenyh po voprosu ob otchuzhdenii sobstvennosti po nazru. (1871). [Controversy of Dagestan Islamic Scholars on the Nazr Alienation of Property]. Sbornik svedeniy o kavkazskih gorcakh. Vol. V. Pt. IV. Tifl is. S. 1–40.
8. Tornau N. N. Izlozhenie nachal musulmanskogo zakonovedeniya. (1850). [Statement of the beginnings of Muslim jurisprudence]. Saint Petersburg. 634 p.
9. Obychaj i zakon v pismennyh pamyatnikakh Dagestana V — nachala XX v. T. 1: do prisoedineniya k Rossii. (2009). [Custom and Law in the Written Monuments of Dagestan, V-early XXth Centuries. Vol. I: Before Joining Russia]. Moscow: Marjani. 248 p.
10. Hrestomatiya po istorii prava i gosudarstva Dagestana v XVIII–XIX vv. [Readings of the History of Law and the State in Dagestan Region in the XVIII–XIXth Centuries]. Part I. (1999). Makhachkala. 122 p.
Review
For citations:
Abdulmazhidov R.S. THE POLEMIC ABOUT THE ALIENATION OF PROPERTY ACCORDING TO ‘NAZR’ IN DAGESTAN IN THE XIX CENTURY. Islam in the modern world. 2018;14(4):183-200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22311/2074-1529-2018-14-4-183-200