THE ROLE OF TRADITIONAL ORIENTAL VALUES IN THE PROCESS OF LEGITIMIZING POWER OF SULTAN OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AT THE TURN OF 19TH-20TH CENTURY
https://doi.org/10.20536/2074-1529-2015-11-3-95-106
Abstract
In the article the official state doctrine of Ottoman Empire is considered. Sultan Abdul Hamid II, who came to power in 1876, together with quite extensive possessions inherited problems in foreign policy issues, and the internal instability of the Ottoman Empire. They were the main factor in the finalization of the official state doctrine of Islamism that replaced the Ottomanism doctrine.
About the Authors
A. M. AbidulinRussian Federation
cand. sci. (hist.), lobachevsky state university of nizhny novgorod.
N. I. Ayupova
Russian Federation
lobachevsky state university of nizhny novgorod (2, ulyanov st, nizhny novgorod, 603006, russian federation).
References
1. Бартольд В. В. Халиф и Султан. Сочинения. М., 1966. Т. IV.
2. Abu-Manneh B. Sultan Abdulhamid II and Shaikh Abulhuda Al-Sayyadi // Middle Eastern Studies. 1979. Vol. II. No. 2.
3. Ahmed Riza Bey. The Caliph and his Duties // Contemporary Review. 1896. No. 70.
4. Arnold T. W. The Caliphate. Oxford. 1924.
5. Blunt W. S. An Arab War of Independence // The Spectator. June 1880.
6. Blunt W. S. The Arab of Mesopotamia and the Syrian Desert // The Spectator. June 1880.
7. Blunt W. S. The Arab Tribes of Bagdad // The Spectator. June 1880.
8. Blunt W. S. The Coming Man in Arabia // The Spectator. June 1880.
9. Blunt W. S. The Sultan’s Heirs Asia // Fortnightly Review. July 1880.
10. Çetin A., Yıldız R. Sultan II. Abdülhamid Han, Devlet ve Memleket Görüşlerim. İstanbul. 1976.
11. Eich T. The Forgotten Salafi — Abul-Huda As-Sayyadi // Die Welt des Islams. 2003. Vol. 43. No. 1.
12. Davison R. H. Reform in the Ottoman Empire 1856–1876. Princeton. 1963.
13. D’Ohsson. Tableau general de l’Empire othoman. Paris, 1787–1824. T. 1.
14. Eraslan C. II. Abdülhamid ve İslam Birliği. İstanbul. 1992.
15. Fortna B. Imperial Classroom. Islam, the State and Education in the Late Ottoman Empire. Oxford. 2002.
16. Fortna B. Islamic Morality in Late Ottoman «Secular» Schools // International Journal of Middle East Studies. 2002. Vol. 32. No. 3.
17. Georgeon F. Sultan II. Abdülhamid. İstanbul. 2006.
18. Karpat K. Pan-İslamism ve İkinci Abdülhamid: Yanlış bir Görüşün Düzeltmesi // Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları. 1987. Sayı 48.
19. Landau J. M. The Politics of Pan-Islamism: Ideology and Organization. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press. 1990.
20. MacColl C. The Musulmans of India and the Sultan // Contemporary Review. 1897. Vol. 71.
21. Özön M. N. Namık Kemal ve İbret Gazetesi. İstanbul. 1997.
22. Panislamism and the Caliphate // Contemporary Review. 1883. No. 43.
23. Redhouse J. A Vindication of the Ottoman Sultan’s Title of Caliph. London. 1877.
24. Sultan Abdülhamid. Siyasi Hatıratım. İstanbul. 1984.
25. Syed Amer Ali. The Caliphate and the Islâmic Renaissance // Edinburgh Review. 1923.
26. The Ottoman Constitution, Promulgated the 7th Zilbridje, 1293 (11/23 December, 1876) // The American Journal of International Law. 1908. Vol. 2. No. 4. Supplement: Official Documents.
27. Toynbee A. J. The Question of the Caliphate // Contemporary Review.1920. No.117.
28. Türköne M. Siyasi İdeoloji Olarak İslamlığın Doğuşu. İstanbul, 1991.
29. Veinstein G. Les origins du caliphat ottoman // Les Annales de l’autre islam. 1994. No. 2.
30. Sultan Abd-ul-Hamid // Contemporary Review. 1895. Vol. 67.
Review
For citations:
Abidulin A.M., Ayupova N.I. THE ROLE OF TRADITIONAL ORIENTAL VALUES IN THE PROCESS OF LEGITIMIZING POWER OF SULTAN OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AT THE TURN OF 19TH-20TH CENTURY. Islam in the modern world. 2015;11(3):95-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20536/2074-1529-2015-11-3-95-106
Views:
836
Email this article 