<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">islam</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Ислам в современном мире</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Islam in the modern world</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-1529</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2618-7221</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Medina Publishing Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22311/2074-1529-2019-15-2-23-46</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">islam-712</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Теологическая мысль в средневековом исламе</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>АРГУМЕНТЫ В ПОЛЬЗУ БЫТИЯ БОГА В КАЛАМЕ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>PROOFS OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD IN ISLAMIC THEOLOGY (KALAM)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Насыров</surname><given-names>И. Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>NASYROV</surname><given-names>I. R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р филос. наук, вед. науч. сотр.,109240, Россия, г. Москва, ул. Гончарная, д. 12, стр. 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D. Sci. (Philos.), chief research fellow.Bld. 1, 12, Goncharnaya str., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">ilshatn60@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Институт философии Российской академии наук<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>07</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>46</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Насыров И.Р., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Насыров И.Р.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">NASYROV I.R.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://islamjournal.idmedina.ru/jour/article/view/712">https://islamjournal.idmedina.ru/jour/article/view/712</self-uri><abstract><p>В данной статье рассматриваются аргументы в пользу существования Бога в мусульманской рациональной/философской теологии (калам). Методы доказательства существования Бога, предложенные мутакаллимами, представителями ведущих школ калама (мутазилизм, ашаризм и матуридизм), объясняются в связи с их поисками логического обоснования коранического утверждения о Боге как первоначале и причине творения мира. Из трех видов аргументации в пользу существования Бога (космологическая, телеологическая и онтологическая) мусульманские теологи в основном предпочитали космологическое доказательство. Хотя они не исключали телеологическую аргументацию из числа доказательств бытия Бога, она играла вспомогательную роль. Некоторые видные ашаритские теологи, как, например, ал-Газали, сочетали аргументы в пользу существования Бога с доказательствами, заимствованными из фалсафы. Особое внимание в статье уделяется доказательствам бытия Бога в учении Абу Мансура ал-Матуриди, основоположника и эпонима матуридитской школы. Это объясняется тем, что ее представители распространяли учение ал-Матуриди среди мусульман ханафитов Мавераннахра (Средняя Азия), Казахстана, Волго-Уральского региона, а также европейской части и Западной Сибири бывшей Российской империи.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The present article is devoted to the study of the proofs for the existence of God in the Mu‘tazilite, Ash‘arite and Maturidi schools of Kalam (Islamic rational/philosophical Theology). The arguments for God’s existence have been proposed by the doctors of Kalam are explicated in the context of their substantiation for the Quran’s assertion that God is First principle and the Ultimate cause of all creation. Of the many proofs for God’s existence — the cosmological, the teleological, and the ontological — only the cosmological type of argument was mostly pressed into service by Muslim theologians. The argument from design, though not overlooked completely, was not used as an independent proof for God’s existence. Some of the prominent As’arite thinkers, like al Ghazalī, combined kalam proofs with philosophical arguments for God’s existence have been utilized in the Islamic Peripatetic School. Special attention is given to the proofs for the existence of God proposed by Abu Mansur al-Maturidi (853–944), the founder and eponym of Maturidi Sunni Kalam school named after him. The analysis of his arguments is relevant due to the fact that Maturidi theological doctrine was the dominant source of theology, followed by most Sunni Hanafi Muslims in Central Asia, Kazakhstan, the Volga-Ural region, the European Part and Western Siberia of the former Russian Empire.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>доказательство существования Бога</kwd><kwd>космологическое доказательство</kwd><kwd>телеологическое доказательство</kwd><kwd>мутазилитская</kwd><kwd>ашаритская и матуридитская школы калама</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>proofs for God’s existence</kwd><kwd>cosmological argument</kwd><kwd>teleological argument</kwd><kwd>Mu‘tazilite</kwd><kwd>Ash‘arite and Maturidi schools of Kalam</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">‘Абд ал-Джаббар. Ал-Мухит би-т-таклиф. Каир: Ад-Дар ал-мисрийа ли-т-та’лиф ва-т-тарджима, б. г. 463 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">‘Abd al-Jabbār (n. d.) Al-Muhīt bi-l-Taklīf (The Encompassing [Treatment of That Which God] Makes Incumbent). Cairo: Al-Dār al-miṣriyya li-l-ta’līf wa-l-tarjima. 463 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">‘Абд ал-Джаббар. Шарх ал-усул ал-хамса. Каир: Мактаба Вахба, 1996. 830 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">‘Abd al-Jabbār (1996). Sharh al-uṣūl al-khamsa (Commentary on the Five Fundamentals [of theology]). Cairo: Maktaba Wahba. 830 p. (In Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аристотель. Метафизика // Сочинения: в 4 т. М.: Мысль. 1976. Т. 1. 550 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abramov B. (1988). Al-Ghazalī’s Theory of Causality. Studia Islamica. No. 67. Pp. 75–98.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Ашари. Ал-Ибана ‘ан ’усул ад-дийана. Каир: Дар аль-ансар, 1977. Т. 1. 261 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anawati G. C. (1986). Hudūth al-‘ālam. The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Vol. III. New ed. Leiden-London. P. 548.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Ашари. Китаб ал-лума‘. Каир: Матба‘ат Миср, 1955. 136 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aristotel’ (1976). Sochineniya [Collected Works], 4 vol. Moscow: Mysl’. Vol. 1. 550 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Ашари. Макалат ал-исламиййин ва ихтилаф ал-мусаллин. Бейрут: Дар Садир, 2006. 351 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Ash‘arī (1977). Kitab al-Ibāna ‘an ’uṣūl al-diyāna [The Clarifi cation of the Principles of Religion]. Cairo: Dār al-anṣār. Vol. 1. 261 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Бакиллани. Китаб ат-тамхид. Бейрут: Ал-Мактаба аш-шаркийа, 1957. 135 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Ash‘arī (1955). Kitab al-luma‘ [The Book of Sparks]. Cairo: Matba‘at Misr. 136 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Газали. Ихйа’ ‘улум ад-дин. Бейрут: Дар аль-ма‘рифа, б. г. Т. 1. 361 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Ash‘arī (2008). Maqālāt al-islāmiyyin wa ikhtilāf al-muṣallin [The Discourses of the Proponents of Islam and the Diff erences Among the Worshippers]. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. 351 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Газали. Макасид ал-фаласифа. Дамаск: Матба‘а ас-сабах, 2000. 226 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Baqillānī (1957). Kitāb al-tamhīd [The Introduction]. Beirut: Al-Maktaba al-sharqiyya. 135 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Джувайни. Аш-Шамил фи ’усул ад-дин. Каир: Дар ал-‘араб, 1988. 120 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Ghazālī (n. d.). Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn [The Revival of Religious Sciences]. Beirut: Dār al-ma‘rifa. Vol. 1. 361 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аз-Забиди, Мухаммад. Итхаф ас-садат ал-муттакин. Бейрут: Дар ихйа’ ат-турас ал-‘араби, 1994. Т. 2. 429 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Ghazālī (2000). Maqāsid al-Falāsifa [Aims of Philosophers]. Damascus: Maṭba‘a al-ṣabāḥ. 226 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ибн-Рушд (Аверроэс). О методах обоснования принципов вероучения. Ч. II / пер. с араб., коммент. и предисл. Т. Ибрагима, Н. В. Ефремовой) / Minbar. Islamic Studies. 2018. № 11(4). С. 783–804.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Khayyat, Abu al-Husayn (1925). Kitab al-intiṣār [The Book of the triumph]. Cairo. 225 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ибн Таймийя. Мас’алат худус ал-‘алам. Бейрут: Дар ал-баша’ир ал-исламийа, 2012. 192 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ibn-Rushd (Averroes) (2018). O metodah obosnovanĳ a principov verouchenĳ a. Chast’ vtoraja [On the Method of Proof for the Principles of Creed. Part Two]. Minbar. Islamic Studies. No. 11 (4). Pp. 783–804.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ибн Таймийя. Минхадж ас-сунна ан-набавийа. Каир: Му’ассасат Куртуба, 1985. Т. 2. 650 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ibn Taymiyyah (2012). Mas’alat hudūth al-‘ālam [On Temporality of the Universe]. Beirut: Dār al-bashāir al-islamiyyah. 192 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ибн ‘Усман ибн Муса ’Афанди. Ал-Масалик фи-л-хилафиййат байна ал-мутакаллимин ва-л-хукама’. Бейрут: Дар Садир, Стамбул: Мактабат ал-иршад, 2007. 250 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ibn Taymiyyah (1985). Minhaj al-Sunna al-nabawi [The Path of the Prophetic Tradition]. Cairo: Mu’assasat Qurtuba. Vol. 2. 650 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ибрагим Т. Калам // НФЭ: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 2010. Т. 2. С. 197–198.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ibn Uthmān ibn Musa Afandī (2007). Al-Masālik fi l-khilāfi yyāt [The Disagreements]. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, Istanbul: Maktabat al-irshād. 250 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ибрагим Т. Перипатетизм арабоязычный / НФЭ: в 4 т. Т. 3. С. 219–220.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ibragim T. (2010). Kalam [Kalam]. Novaia fi losofskaia entsiklopediia. Moscow: Mysl’. Vol. 2. Pp. 197–198 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ибрагим Т. К. Религиозная философия ислама. Калам. Казань: Казанский университет, 2013. 212 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ibragim T. (2010). Peripatetizm araboiazychnyi [Peripatetic Arabic School]. Novaia fi losofskaia entsiklopediia. Moscow: Mysl’. Vol. 3. Pp. 219–220 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Исфахани, ’Абу ‘Али Ахмад. Ал-Азмина ва-л-амкина. Б.м., б. г. 284 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ibragim T. K. (2013). Religioznaya fi losofi ya islama. Kalam [Religious Philosophy of Islam: Kalam]. Kazan’: Kazanskii universitet. 2013. 212 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кричевский А. В. Доказательства бытия Бога // НФЭ: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 2010. Т. 1. С. 285–286.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Isfahānī, Abu ‘Ali Ahmad (n. d.). Al-Azmina wa-l-amkina [The Times and the Places]. 284 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Матуриди. Китаб ат-тавхид. Бейрут: Дар Садир, 2010. 538 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Juwayni (1988). Al-Shāmil fi uṣūl al-dīn [Summa on the Principles of Religion]. Cairo: Dār al-‘arab. 212 c. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Насыров И. Р. Доказательства существования Бога в исламской теологии (калам) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: «Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение». 2017. Вып. 73. С. 53–68.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krichevskii A. V. (2010). Dokazatel’stva bytiia Boga [Proofs for the existence of God]. Novaia fi losofskaia entsiklopediia. Moscow: Mysl’. Vol. 1. Pp. 285–286 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Платон. Законы (X) // Собрание сочинений: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1994. Т. 4. 830, [1] с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Maturidī (2010). Kitāb al-tawhīd [The Book of Divine Unity]. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. 538 p. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ат-Тафтазани. Шарх ал-макасид. Бейрут: Дар ал-кутуб ал-‘илмиййа, 2011. Т. 2. 510 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nasyrov I. R. (2017). Dokazatel’stva sushhestvovanĳ a Boga v islamskoj teologii (kalam) [Proofs for the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic Theology (Kalam)]. Vestnik PSTGU Ser. 1. Bogoslovie. Filosofi ia. Religiovedenie. Vol. 73. Pp. 53–68 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ал-Хаййат, Абу ал-Хусайн. Китаб аль-интисар. Каир: Дар ал-‘арабийа ли-л-китаб, 1980. 225 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Plato (1994). Zakony (X) [The Laws]. Sobranie sochinenii. 4 vols. Moscow: Mysl’. Vol. 4. 830, [1] p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аш-Шахрастани, Мухаммад. Китаб ал-милал ва-н-нихал. Бейрут: Дар ал-ма‘рифа, 1983. Т. 1. 255 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Shakhrastanī, Muhammad (1983). Kitab al-milal va al-nikhal [Book on Religious and Philosophical Sects]. Beirut: Dār al-ma‘rifa. Vol. 1. Pp. 255 (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аш-Шахрастани. Книга о религиях и сектах. (Китаб ал-милал ва-н-нихал). Ч. 1. Ислам / пер. с араб., введ. и коммент. С. М. Прозорова. М.: Издательство «Наука», Главная редакция восточной литературы, 1984. 270 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Shakhrastanī (1984). Kitab al-milal va al-nikhal [Book on Religious and Philosophical Sects]. Moscow. 270 pp. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аш-Шахрастани. Нихайат ал-икдам фи ‘илм ал-калам. Бейрут: Дар ал-кутуб ал-‘илмийа, 2004. 286 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Shahrastani (2004). Nihāya al-iqdām fi ilm al-kalām [The End of Steps in the Science of Theology]. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ilmiyya. 286 pp. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abramov B. Al-Ghazalī’s Theory of Causality // Studia Islamica. 1988. No. 67. Pp. 75–98.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Taftazanī (2011). Sharh al-maqāṣid [Explanation of Purposes]. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-‘ilmiyyah. Vol. 2. 510 pp. (in Arabic).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anawati G. C. Hudūth al-‘ālam // The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Vol. III. New ed. Leiden-London. 1986. P. 548.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Treiger A. (2008). The Science of Divine Disclosure: Gazali’s Higher Theology and Its Philosophical Underpinnings. Diss. Yale University. 384 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Treiger A. The Science of Divine Disclosure: Gazali’s Higher Theology and Its Philosophical Underpinnings. Diss. Yale University, 2008. 384 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Al-Zabīdī, Muhammad (1994). Itḥāf al-sādat al-muttakīn [The Gift of God-fearing Gentlemen]. Beirut: Dar ihya’ al-turas al-arabi. Vol. 2. 429 p. (in Arabic)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
