islamИслам в современном миреIslam in the modern world2074-15292618-7221Medina Publishing Ltd10.22311/2074-1529-2018-14-3-181-196islam-645Research ArticleИСТОРИЯ РЕЛИГИИHISTORY OF RELIGIONПРОБЛЕМЫ СИСТЕМНОЙ КЛАССИФИКАЦИИ РЕЛИГИЙTHE PROBLEMS OF THE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION OF RELIGIONSАликберовА. К. AlikberovA. K.

канд. ист. наук, зам. директора.

107031 Москва, ул. Рождественка, 12/14.

D. Sci. (Hist.), Deputy Director.

12, Rozhdestvenka Str., Moscow, 107031.

alikberov@mail.ruИнститут востоковедения РАН.РоссияInstitute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences.Russian Federation201802102018143181196Copyright © Аликберов А.К., 20182018Аликберов А.К. Alikberov A.K.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://islamjournal.idmedina.ru/jour/article/view/645

Статья посвящена проблемам системной классификации религий на основе различных критериев, важнейшим из которых является коммуникационный. Как показывает кросс-культурный метод, во многих языках мира нет слова «религия», но есть его эквивалент, обозначающий связь человека с Богом, божествами, сверхъестественными силами. Системная классификация религий — это скорее не одна классификация, а система классификаций, которая исходит из идеальных, гипотетических моделей. В качестве примера автор приводит классификации на основе объекта поклонения (религии Природы, религии Традиции, религии Откровения), источников вероучения (религии Священных культов, религии Священного Предания и религии Священного Писания), способа получения информации, или, в религиозной парадигме, — религиозного знания/сокровенных истин (пророческие, непророческие и промежуточные), а также пытается найти сопряжения между ними в общей системе координат. Системно-коммуникационный метод представляет собой один из многих возможных способов научного познания религии, который позволяет делить сложные социальные сущности и явления на составные элементы и рассматривать каждый из них в их тесной взаимосвязи и взаимодействии с другими элементами системного научного познания с учетом специфики религиозной коммуникации.

The article is devoted to the system classifi cation of religions on the basis of various criteria, the most important of which is the communication one. As the cross-cultural method shows, there is no word «religion» in many languages o  f the world, but there is its equivalent, denoting the connection of man with God and supernatural forces. The system classifi cation of religions is more a system of classifi cations than a classifi cation, which based on ideal, hypothetical models. It based on the object of worship (the religion of Nature, the religion of Tradition, the religion of Revelation), on the sources of the doctrine (the religion of the scriptures), on the methods of obtaining information, or, in the religious paradigm, religious knowledge /hidden truths (prophetic, non-prophetic, etc.). The author tries to fi nd conjugations between these classifi cations. The system-communication method is one of many possible ways of scientifi c knowledge of religion, which allows us to divide complex social essences and phenomena into composite elements, and each of them in their close interconnection and interaction with other elements of systematic knowledge, taking into account the specifi city of religious communication.

классификация религийсистемный подходрелигиозная коммуникациярелигии Откровениярелигии Традициирелигии Культовбиблейская традицияавраамические религиимировые религииclassifi cation of religionssystems approachreligious communicationreligion of revelationreligion of traditionreligion of cultsbiblical traditionAbrahamic religionsworld religionsReferencesАвгустин Блаженный. О Граде Божием. М.: АСТ, 2000. 1296 с.St. Augustin of Hippo (2000). O grade bozhyem [The City of God]. Moscow: AST. 1296 p.Бенвенист Э. Словарь индоевропейских социальных терминов. М.: Прогресс-Универс, 1995. 456 с.Benveniste E. (1995). Slovar’ indoevropeyskih social’nih terminov [Dictionary of Indo-European Concepts and Society]. Moscow: Progress-Univers. 456 p.Бойс М. Зороастрийцы. Верования и обычаи / пер. с англ. и примеч. И. М. Стеблин-Каменского; послесл. Э. А. Грантовского. М.: Наука — Гл. ред. вост. лит-ры, 1988. 303 c.Boyce M. (1988). Zoroastriyci. Verovaniya i obychai [Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices]. Moscow: Nauka. 303 p.Каратини Р. Катары. Боевой путь альбигойской ереси / пер. с фр. А. Васильковой. М.: Эксмо, 2010. 395 c.Caratini R. (2010). Katary. Boyevoy put’ al’bigoyskoy eresi [The Cathars or the Battle Way of Albigenses Heresy]. Moscow: Eksmo. 395 p.Луман Н. Социальные системы: Очерк общей теории / пер. с нем. И. Д. Газиева; под ред. Н. А. Головина. СПб.: Наука, 2007. 641 с.Luhmann N. (2007). Social’niye sistemy: ocherk obshey teorii [Social Systems. An Outline of the General Theory]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. 641 p.Прозоров С. М. Ислам как идеологическая система [Т. 1]; М.: Наука — Вост. лит-ра, 2004. 472 с. Т. 2. М.: Наука — Вост. лит-ра, 2016. 368 c.Prozorov S. M. (2004, 2016). Islam kak ideologicheskaya sistema. T. 1, T. 2 [Islam as Ideological System. Vol. 1, Vol. 2]. Moscow: Nauka — Vostochnaya literature. 472, 368 p.Торчинов Е. А. Религии мира. Опыт запредельного. СПб.: Петеpбypгское Востоковедение, 2005. 544 с.Torchinov E. A. (2005). Religii mira. Opyt zapredel’nogo [Experience of the Transcendent in the Religions of the World]. Saint Petersburg: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie. 544 p.Хосроев А. Л. История манихейства (Prolegomena). СПб.: Филологический факультет Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета, 2007. 488 с.Khosroev A. L. (2007). Istoriya maniheystva (Prolegomena). [The History of the Manichaeism]. Saint Petersburg: Filologicheskiy fakul’tet Sankt-Petersburgskogo universiteta. 488 p.Apte, Vaman Sh. The Practical Sanskrit Dictionary. 4th Ed., revised & enlarged. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1965. 1160 p.Apte, Vaman Sh. The Practical Sanskrit Dictionary. 4th Ed., revised & enlarged. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1965. 1160 p.Asad, Talal. The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category // Genealogies of Religion. Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore–London: Johns Hopkins University, 1993. Pp. 27–54.Asad, Talal. The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category //Genealogies of Religion. Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore — London: Johns Hopkins University, 1993. Pp. 27–54.Brodd J. World Religions: a voyage of discovery. With a Foreword by Gregory L. Sobolewski. 2nd Ed. Winona, MN: Saint Mary’s Press, 2003. 312 p.Brodd J. World Religions: a voyage of discovery. With a Foreword by Gregory L. Sobolewski. 2nd Ed. Winona, MN: Saint Mary’s Press, 2003. 312 p.Buckley J. J. The Mandaeans: Ancient Texts and Modern People. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 216 p.Buckley J. J. The Mandaeans: Ancient Texts and Modern People. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 216 p.Encyclopædia Britannica. In 32 Vols. 15th Ed. Vol. 22. 1987.Encyclopædia Britannica. In 32 Vols. 15th Ed. Vol. 22. 1987.Flood, Gavin. An Introduction to Hinduism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 343 p.Flood, Gavin. An Introduction to Hinduism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 343 p.Gardet L. Dīn // The Encyclopaedia of Islam. New Edition. Vol. II. Ed. by B. Lewis, Ch. Pellat and J. Schacht. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1991. Pp. 293–296.Gardet L. Dīn //The Encyclopaedia of Islam. New Edition. Vol. II. Ed. by B. Lewis, Ch. Pellat and J. Schacht. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1991. Pp. 293– 296.Garsoian, Nina. The Paulician Heresy: A Study of the Origin and Development of Paulicianism in Armenia and the Eastern Provinces of the Byzantine Empire. The Hague: Mouton, 1967. 300 p.Garsoian, Nina. The Paulician Heresy: A Study of the Origin and Development of Paulicianism in Armenia and the Eastern Provinces of the Byzantine Empire. The Hague: Mouton, 1967. 300 p.Geaves, Ron. The Borders between Religions: A Challenge to the World Religions Approach to Religious Education //British Journal of Religious Education. Vol. 21. 1998. No. 1. Pp. 20–31.Geaves, Ron. The Borders between Religions: A Challenge to the World Religions Approach to Religious Education //British Journal of Religious Education. Vol. 21. 1998. No. 1. Pp. 20–31.Geertz, Cliff ord. Religion as a Cultural System //Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. Ed. Michael Banton. ASA Monographs, 3. London: Tavistock Publications, 1966. Pp. 1–46.Geertz, Cliff ord. Religion as a Cultural System //Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. Ed. Michael Banton. ASA Monographs, 3. London: Tavistock Publications, 1966. Pp. 1–46.Gauchet M. The Disenchantment of the World: A Political History of Religion. Transl. by O. Burge. With a Foreword by Charles Taylor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. 229 p.Gauchet M. The Disenchantment of the World: A Political History of Religion. Transl. by O. Burge. With a Foreword by Charles Taylor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. 229 p.James, Duren; Ward, Henderson. The Classifi cation of Religions: Diff erent Methods, Their Advantages and Disadvantages (Classic Reprint). FB&C Limited, 2018 [1909]. 84 p.James, Duren; Ward, Henderson. The Classifi cation of Religions: Diff erent Methods, Their Advantages and Disadvantages (Classic Reprint). FB&C Limited, 2018 [1909]. 84 p.Lactanti, L. Caeli Firmiani. Divinae Institutiones //Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum. Vol. 19. Editum consilio et impensis Academiae Litterarum Caesarae Vindobonensis. Vindobonae: Apud C. Geroldi Bibliopolam Academiae, MDCCCLXVI. 761 s.Lactanti, L. Caeli Firmiani. Divinae Institutiones //Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum. Vol. 19. Editum consilio et impensis Academiae Litterarum Caesarae Vindobonensis. Vindobonae: Apud C. Geroldi Bibliopolam Academiae, MDCCCLXVI. 761 s.Luhmann, Niklas. A Systems Theory of Religion (Cultural Memory in the Present). Ed. by André Kieserling. Transl. by David A. Brenner with Adrian Hermann. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 2013. 320 p.Luhmann, Niklas. A Systems Theory of Religion (Cultural Memory in the Present). Ed. by André Kieserling. Transl. by David A. Brenner with Adrian Hermann. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 2013. 320 p.Macke, Frank J. Intrapersonal Communicology: Refl ection, Refl exibility, and Relational Consciousness in Embodied Subjectivity //Communicology: The New Science of Embodied Discourse. Ed. by Debora Eicher and Isaak E. Catt. Madison — Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2010. Pp. 33–62.Macke, Frank J. Intrapersonal Communicology: Refl ection, Refl exibility, and Relational Consciousness in Embodied Subjectivity // Communicology: The New Science of Embodied Discourse. Ed. by Debora Eicher and Isaak E. Catt. Madison — Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2010. Pp. 33–62.Obolensky D. D. The Bogomils: A Study in Balkan Neo-Manichaeism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948. 332 p.Obolensky D. D. The Bogomils: A Study in Balkan Neo-Manichaeism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948.Pace, Enzo. Religion as Communication: God’s Talk. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2011. 168 p.p. Pace, Enzo. Religion as Communication: God’s Talk. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2011. 168 p.Parrish, Fred L. The Classifi cation of Religions: Its Relation to the History of Religions. Herald Press, 1941. 157 p.Parrish, Fred L. The Classifi cation of Religions: Its Relation to the History of Religions. Herald Press, 1941. 157 p.Tokarev S. A. Principles of the Morphological Classifi cation of Religions (Part II) //Soviet Anthropology and Archeology. Vol. 5. 1966. No. 1. Pp. 11–25.Tokarev S. A. Principles of the Morphological Classifi cation of Religions (Part II) //Soviet Anthropology and Archeology. Vol. 5. 1966. No. 1. Pp. 11–25.Walser, Joseph. The Classifi cation of Religions and Religious Classifi cations: a Genre Approach to the Origin of Religions //Culture and Religion. An Interdisciplinary Journal. Vol. 16. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 345–371.Walser, Joseph. The Classifi cation of Religions and Religious Classifi cations: a Genre Approach to the Origin of Religions //Culture and Religion. An Interdisciplinary Journal. Vol. 16. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 345–371.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.